3 ms·
What I find interesting about the XKCD is that the entropy analysis is basically spot-on, even very generous towards the opposition. It shows that a) the typi
by danielbarla 7y ago
What I find interesting about the XKCD is that the
entropy analysis is basically spot-on, even very generous towards the opposition. It shows that a) the typical "strong password" that people pick is not truly random (i.e. not 26+26+10+10, but worse), and b) that under these conditions even a 4-length pass phrase picked from a measly dictionary of 2048 words is better. (This is probably an even more interesting / compelling argument.)
Yet somehow, each time the XKCD is posted, someone will "point out" that pass phrases can be dictionary attacked, which is kind of like me saying "I know which letters are on your keyboard, and can therefore brute force your password!", but not having done the math beyond that.