5 ms·
I'd much prefer the (theoretical) gene drive. Bad outcomes for gene drive are either that it doesn't work, or the mosquitoes go extinct in nature and cause mor
by jimworm 7y ago
I'd much prefer the (theoretical) gene drive.
Bad outcomes for gene drive are either that it doesn't work, or the mosquitoes go extinct in nature and cause more ecological issues by their absence. The worst problem is fixable by keeping live specimens for reintroduction. In fact, since malaria is the target and not the mosquitoes, reintroduction might be a good idea after malaria becomes extinct.
Bad outcomes for the fungus is it becoming uncontrollable and starts killing other insects. Reintroduction becomes impossible without engineering a new, immune mosquito. Or that evolution backfires on the spider and causes them to go extinct. Or all of those happening together.
Comparing the two, the fungus has all the downsides and more, with zero upside.
- andygates 7y agoThe fungus doesn't affect other insects - this was part of the test. So the worst case is that it becomes uncontrollable and wipes out the mosquitoes.
- pfdietz 7y agoThey've given the fungus a powerful new weapon, so I would be concerned it could evolve to attack new hosts.
- gdy 7y agoIt can mutate
- jimworm 7y agoI was justifying my preference for the gene drive compared with the fungus. The fungus has potential to evolve independently to do different things, the gene drive does not. QED.
- foobiekr 7y agoHow did this fungus come into being so specialized, I wonder.