2 ms·
I don't. Which is why I called a non-efficient solution. A theoretical solution would be to require ignition interlocks on all new vehicles. Not that I am advoc
by petschge 7y ago
I don't. Which is why I called a non-efficient solution. A theoretical solution would be to require ignition interlocks on all new vehicles. Not that I am advocating for that. A more realistic solution should focus more on officers observing and punishing bad driving, including all the effects of driving drunk or with cellphone in hand.
- leetcrew 7y agoI could certainly support cops focusing more on reckless driving (tailgating, weaving, no-signal lane changes). if a cop sees a driver doing something unsafe with their own two eyes, I have no problem with them making a stop. I bet they would actually end up catching a decent number of drunk drivers this way.
- reshie 7y agothey already have breathalyzer starters for cars for repeat offenders.