We all know that when people talk about coercion of removal of online content, they're talking about content they deem worthy of removal. You can avoid cogniti

We all know that when people talk about coercion of removal of online content, they're talking about content they deem worthy of removal. You can avoid cognitive dissonance if you assume you have the "right" perspective on how to bucket content into two groups, acceptable and unacceptable, and that the bucketing made by regulators will be identical to yours, since it's clearly the only objectively correct one. Of course, this is so far from reality if such a thing were to be implemented that it's not worth taking seriously.