3 ms·
You could try but it'd still be possible to just fake it at the sensor level, essentially so the IC would see your video as the analog signal coming in and enco
by buildzr 7y ago
You could try but it'd still be possible to just fake it at the sensor level, essentially so the IC would see your video as the analog signal coming in and encode it as if it were any other image. It's basically the "analog hole" of the video world.
If you wanted to do the cheap version of this you could probably set up a screen with proper lighting such that it'd line up well enough that screen and sensor pixels matched closely making it near if not completely impossible to tell a screen was involved.
Worse, such a signature on a fake video may give people false confidence in it being real, when really it still needs scrutiny especially if a possible state level or dedicated attacker is involved.
- floatingatoll 7y agoNikon’s been offering chip-based video crypto for years, it’s just not popular in consumer-grade hardware yet. If it was, we’d all be up in arms about our devices having a unique fingerprint in every photo (or video) that could be used to track us.
- anbop 7y agoYou could have onboard acceleration and depth sensors on the camera to make the fake costlier to produce.
- alasdair_ 7y ago>If you wanted to do the cheap version of this you could probably set up a screen with proper lighting such that it'd line up well enough that screen and sensor pixels matched closely making it near if not completely impossible to tell a screen was involved. You could make things more difficult by using multiple cameras (and perhaps some other sensors) to detect a 3D scene rather than just a 2D representation, but I agree that it's all ultimately fakeable.