3 ms·
I think what he means is that just because you have tests (and even if you have high code coverage) doesn't meant that your code is high quality. They're corre
by commandlinefan 7y ago
I think what he means is that just because you have tests (and even if you have high code coverage) doesn't meant that your code is high quality. They're correlated, but I've actually seen code with high test coverage... whose tests never made any assertions.
- jasode 7y ago>tests [...] doesn't meant that your code is high quality. They're correlated, Yes, if they're correlated, that contradicts the absolutist statement of "Tests have nothing to do with code quality." Trying to improve code correctness is directly affecting code quality.