7 ms·
I am not disagreeing. I believe these crackers should serve jail time just as much as you do. I am just stating that I do not lift blame from Gawkers.
by Xk 16y ago
I am not disagreeing. I believe these crackers should serve jail time just as much as you do. I am just stating that I do not lift blame from Gawkers.
- hugh3 16y agoSo it's the old short-skirt-leads-to-rape argument again? On one hand, rape is entirely the fault of the rapist. On the other hand, it's still not a good idea to walk alone down a dodgy alley late at night wearing a short skirt or to go back to Julian Assange's hotel room. Discussing one point shouldn't detract from the other.
- jlcgull 16y agoSo it's the old short-skirt-leads-to-rape argument again? On one hand, rape is entirely the fault of the rapist. On the other hand, it's still not a good idea to walk alone down a dodgy alley late at night wearing a short skirt or to go back to hugh3's hotel room. Discussing one point shouldn't detract from the other. Ahem, just correcting your assumption.
- Xk 16y agoNo, I'm not trying to argue that at all. That case is entirely the rapist's fault. The difference I am trying to make is people have trusted (maybe wrongly) Gawker to protect their information. Gawker failed to do so.