4 ms·
> I’m obviously not in line with the tenor of this thread, but I really don’t think it’s a big deal. If this sort of abuse isn't nipped in the bud, it will onl
by geezerjay 7y ago
> I’m obviously not in line with the tenor of this thread, but I really don’t think it’s a big deal.
If this sort of abuse isn't nipped in the bud, it will only get worse and become standard operating procedure for each and every single ad company, big and small.
- erikpukinskis 7y agoPeople could complain about low quality edits without clutching their pearls over the idea that a marketing team would deign to edit anything.
- geezerjay 7y agoIf a marketing team wants to edit anything then let them put up their own blog or website instead of abusing other people's service. It's this sort of abuse that brought spam into the world and pretty much destroyed fundamental services such as email and also usenet.
- erikpukinskis 7y agoIt’s just hard to take your concern seriously because I doubt you have spoken out against the top spammers on Wikipedia, but you care about this one silly project. But please correct me if I’m wrong and this is an issue you are invested in.
- geezerjay 7y agoYou have no idea who I am so refrain from making up accusations and personal attacks founded on your personal baseless assertions. If you have nothing of value to add to the discussion, simply don't add noise or drama to the discussion.
- erikpukinskis 7y agoWhat personal attack? I expressed doubt and a willingness to be corrected. If you can name another “vandal” party who you’ve spoken out against, or even another party you are aware of then I will stand corrected.