3 ms·
The places where this is targeted for aren't close to a grid to be able to pump the power back into it. The benefit of this sort of system is that it gives you
by pwagland 7y ago
The places where this is targeted for aren't close to a grid to be able to pump the power back into it.
The benefit of this sort of system is that it gives you a way to consume electricity close to the source, so that you don't end up with the distribution costs.
I do agree that doesn't seem like the best choice, but the alternatives proposed are not alternatives in the situations that this is targeting. I suspect/hope that there _are_ other alternatives, that may serve a better "global good".
- henearkr 7y agoWell, the argument seems invalid, as they obviously use energy to run their oil field (look at these huge hammer-like machines). They could use this energy. Even their very local grid is a grid.
- SilasX 7y agoRight, but I think their local energy needs are far less than what these burnoffs contain.