This kind of crap is why we need to be cautious in allowing Google too much control over web standards, including AMP and their not-iframe element (portals [1])

This kind of crap is why we need to be cautious in allowing Google too much control over web standards, including AMP and their not-iframe element (portals [1]). Whilst the engineers mean well when creating them, Google's main objective is to make money, not to make a better web. At the moment you have awesome projects like Project Zero [2], but how long till they start strategically handling exploits for monetary gain? Contrast Project Zero to Project Dragonfly [3]. Nobody should be relying on them being good actors. [1] https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-launches-portals-a-new-web-page-navigation-system-for-chrome/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/google-launches-portals-a-new-... [2] https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/ https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/ [3] https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/26/technology/google-dragonfly-senate-hearing/index.html https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/26/technology/google-dragonfly...