4 ms·

This is not an accurate representation of the current status quo. Medical marijuana is effectively legal at the federal level in states where it is legal. The f

This is not an accurate representation of the current status quo. Medical marijuana is effectively legal at the federal level in states where it is legal. The federal government, via the appropriations bill has not allocated any funding to prosecuting these crime. More recent case law has clarified the meaning of this, it explicitly forbids prosecuting these crimes in states where medical marijuana is legal. In a number of cases where the accused was charged and plead guilty, prosecution was later stopped(and hundreds of thousands in cash, and precious metals that were seized, were all returned) because of this.

manfredo 7y ago
> Medical marijuana is effectively legal at the federal level in states where it is legal. Do you not see the contradiction in this statement? > Medical marijuana is effectively legal at the federal level in states where it is legal. The federal government, via the appropriations bill has not allocated any funding to prosecuting these crime. More recent case law has clarified the meaning of this, it explicitly forbids prosecuting these crimes in states where medical marijuana is legal. In a number of cases where the accused was charged and plead guilty, prosecution was later stopped(and hundreds of thousands in cash, and precious metals that were seized, were all returned) because of this. Which completely agrees with the point I'm making. It's still against the law, it's just that some states are refusing to enforce it. This is not the same thing as something being legal. This is not just pedantic quibbling, it has real consequences. The constitution forbids persecution for illegal actions so long as they were legal at the time they were committed. But cannabis isn't legal. Which means that if the attitude towards cannabis changes, it is possible for a future administration to persecute everyone that bought or sold pot. Individuals like you an I may not care very much about this possibility, but the shareholders and executives of multi billion dollar companies unsurprisingly have a different mindset.
- ujoh1 7y ago
  Hello See how you can start making steady extra living incomes of $100 daily on virta stock trading without you risking your money and your investment visit the website here http://www.virtatrade.com/index.php http://www.virtatrade.com/index.php for more details
- gnopgnip 7y ago
  It is not states that are refusing, but that the federal government is barred from enforcing it. Legal marijuana spending in the US and Canada totaled $12 billion last year and is expected to hit $18 billion this year, in large part because of the current status of the law.
5555624 7y ago
> Medical marijuana is effectively legal at the federal level in states where it is legal. Unless you're a federal employee. If you're a federal employee, marijuana use is prohibited, even if it is legal in the state where you reside, since it remains a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substance Act (CSA). As I understand it, under the CSA, doctors cannot issue prescriptions for marijuana use

manfredo 7y ago

> Medical marijuana is effectively legal at the federal level in states where it is legal. Do you not see the contradiction in this statement? > Medical marijuana is effectively legal at the federal level in states where it is legal. The federal government, via the appropriations bill has not allocated any funding to prosecuting these crime. More recent case law has clarified the meaning of this, it explicitly forbids prosecuting these crimes in states where medical marijuana is legal. In a number of cases where the accused was charged and plead guilty, prosecution was later stopped(and hundreds of thousands in cash, and precious metals that were seized, were all returned) because of this. Which completely agrees with the point I'm making. It's still against the law, it's just that some states are refusing to enforce it. This is not the same thing as something being legal. This is not just pedantic quibbling, it has real consequences. The constitution forbids persecution for illegal actions so long as they were legal at the time they were committed. But cannabis isn't legal. Which means that if the attitude towards cannabis changes, it is possible for a future administration to persecute everyone that bought or sold pot. Individuals like you an I may not care very much about this possibility, but the shareholders and executives of multi billion dollar companies unsurprisingly have a different mindset.

ujoh1 7y ago
Hello See how you can start making steady extra living incomes of $100 daily on virta stock trading without you risking your money and your investment visit the website here http://www.virtatrade.com/index.php http://www.virtatrade.com/index.php for more details
gnopgnip 7y ago
It is not states that are refusing, but that the federal government is barred from enforcing it. Legal marijuana spending in the US and Canada totaled $12 billion last year and is expected to hit $18 billion this year, in large part because of the current status of the law.

5555624 7y ago

> Medical marijuana is effectively legal at the federal level in states where it is legal. Unless you're a federal employee. If you're a federal employee, marijuana use is prohibited, even if it is legal in the state where you reside, since it remains a Schedule I substance under the Controlled Substance Act (CSA). As I understand it, under the CSA, doctors cannot issue prescriptions for marijuana use