3 ms·
Yes, but so does Chrome. In that regard, Firefox is not a worse option, just equally suboptimal.
by josteink 7y ago
Yes, but so does Chrome.
In that regard, Firefox is not a worse option, just equally suboptimal.
- behringer 7y agoSigning is pretty important. Without signing anybody could surreptitiously replace your addon with something else.
- josteink 7y agoOnly if they have local access. In which case, I’ve already lost.
- 0xffff2 7y agoHow so? Either they already have access to my computer, in which case browser addons are the least of my concerns, or they've compromised Mozilla in some way in which case who's to say they can't sign their fake addon too?
- Mirioron 7y agoBut it also means that I can't have an add on that Mozilla doesn't sign, right?
- Mirioron 7y agoIt does? But I'm using add ons that I made on Chrome that I haven't registered or signed anywhere. I thought Firefox disallows that?