3 ms·

Erlang's Joe Armstrong on RPC: "The road we didn't go down"

• socksandsandals 18y ago
  Great post. Cliff Click, Jr. should read this right away and think some more about this "new paradigm".
• bayareaguy 18y ago
  Although it's funny and refreshing seeing a comment from like that from Mr. "Advanced CORBA Programming with C++" Vinoski after all these years, there are plenty of good systems built around RPC primitives. It just took them a long time to work out their failure modes because they couldn't reason about them the way they could in an Erlang system.
• signa11 18y ago
  "OTP should re-branded as "OTP on rails" it's really just a framework for building fault tolerant systems." nice ! edit: using that as the title, would have gotten this much more upvotes.
  • a-priori 18y ago
    Haha, you're probably right. I wasn't thinking of how to best be a karma whore, but that would have gotten more interest. It was just an interesting article.
• bandris 18y ago
  Here is a reply from Steve Vinoski: http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/05/27/joe-armstrong-erlang-and-rpc/ http://steve.vinoski.net/blog/2008/05/27/joe-armstrong-erlan...
  • rickardg 18y ago
    Not only that, there is a long and interesting comment from Joe Armstrong as well.