As someone who has regularly used LittleIpsum at work (web developer), I was discouraged to see that Apple rejected it. I'd hate to see him overbloat the softw

As someone who has regularly used LittleIpsum at work (web developer), I was discouraged to see that Apple rejected it. I'd hate to see him overbloat the software to meet the "requirements" as the perfection of LittleIpsum comes from it's simplicity. It's the ideal kind of software for the Mac App Store since it's small, has a relatively limited feature scope, and (for now) is free. I'm sure that we're going to see some other unusual/dubious rejections over the next month or two while both developers figure out the system and Apple refines it's internal requirements.