3 ms·
I just don't think the cliff Uber will use for cutting off riders is going to be "got 3* a few times for taking too long to get in and out of a car." Drivers ar
by jdminhbg 7y ago
I just don't think the cliff Uber will use for cutting off riders is going to be "got 3* a few times for taking too long to get in and out of a car." Drivers aren't quitting Uber because of those riders. They're going to be cutting off people routinely rated 1* for being dangerously intoxicated, ranting about minorities, making passes at drivers, etc.
- jopsen 7y agoOr riders asking for a U-turn on the highway. If you also your Uber driver they all have amazing stories of unreasonable riders.
- jakear 7y agoThe problem is that usually when a place decides to refuse service to a person, there is a single person making that decision who can be held accountable for it in the event an issue comes up with protected classes. What people “think the cliff will be” is irrelevant, the problem is lack of accountability. There is no way to show that they aren’t violating protected statuses, and there is no accountability if they are.
- seieste 7y agoThe cutoff is 4.6, which could be achieved by just 1 bad rating out of 10. (E.g. one 1 star and 9 5 star reviews)