4 ms·
You're right, although $99/year is nominal in the context of the cost and effort of even lightweight software development.
by jmull 7y ago
You're right, although $99/year is nominal in the context of the cost and effort of even lightweight software development.
- saagarjha 7y ago$99/year is a reasonably large amount of money for many people around the world.
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]
- ksec 7y agoAnd ever since the introduction of iPhone, Apple has had additional millions of $99/year from iOS developers, yet the pace of improvement for Xcode, or even its documentation has gone worst, and not better. I seriously hope they have something to show for in the coming WWDC.
- saagarjha 7y agoI have found that Xcode’s pace of improvement has gotten better in the last few years.
- threeseed 7y agoYou know you need to buy an iPhone and Mac as well right. So $99 pales in comparison to the cost of both.
- saagarjha 7y agoI don’t need to buy an iPhone and a Mac: I only really need a Mac, which I can borrow, rent, buy used, virtualize…
- fauigerzigerk 7y agoWell, you need to buy an iPhone and a Mac only once every 5 years or so whereas the $99 fee is per annum. So this can be significant for someone who is scraping by on a low budget.
- thegayngler 7y agoOur iOS engineer at work doesn't even own an iPhone. I just thought I would point that out.
- bosie 7y agoHow does your ios engineer test the in-house apps?