> This is a great argument against all OTA devices Indeed. And for life safety uses it's appropriate. In safety-conscious settings such as those involving line

> This is a great argument against all OTA devices Indeed. And for life safety uses it's appropriate. In safety-conscious settings such as those involving line voltages requiring NRTL (UL for ex) listing OTA updates are forbidden: One must have physical access to the device to perform a permitted [0] code update. [0] And the code updates themselves are subject to IEC 60730/UL 1998 or it's back to the NRTL for more testing