I instinctively find this utterly repulsive, evil, no different to China’s social credit scoring. How can an average of 4.6 be meaningful for determining fitnes

I instinctively find this utterly repulsive, evil, no different to China’s social credit scoring. How can an average of 4.6 be meaningful for determining fitness to ride - that’s a rediculous number. A mechanism for preventing truly abusive or violent riders should be based on specific reporting and video evidence, not a dumb aggregate score. I am generally against regulation if possible, but this insane policy requires urgent remedy by regulators, Uber is becoming an important part of our travel infrastructure, so requires regulation just like rail, air etc.