> There's no objective answer Yes, absolutely > and in the end, you end up saying "these people here are more important than those people there". Which is fin

> There's no objective answer Yes, absolutely > and in the end, you end up saying "these people here are more important than those people there". Which is fine of course, I just prefer that to be clear and not pretend like there's some absolute moral guidance we can turn to. If you do not have an answer to the question, then you just use other defaults. It’s like how there’s no such thing as “unbiased journalism” - you either consciously choose your bias or unconsciously use someone else’s.