3 ms·
JS and JSX are isomorphic (in the mathematical sense) hence why JSX is considered just syntactic sugar. JS and TS aren't isomorphic (there's no inverse morphis
by kaoD 7y ago
JS and JSX are isomorphic (in the mathematical sense) hence why JSX is considered just syntactic sugar.
JS and TS aren't isomorphic (there's no inverse morphism once you go TS->JS that can bring the resulting JS back to the original TS) hence why TS is a different language (even if a superset of and compiled to JS).
- lostjohnny 7y ago> JS and JSX are isomorphic They are not Or, if they are, they are in the same way of a custom XML templating language that can be translated to a specific javascript library implementation and then back to XML In the same way, is Mustache isomorphic? "{{title}} spends {{calc}}" can be translated to `${title} spends ${calc}` and back to "{{title}} spends {{calc}}"
- deleted 7y ago[deleted]