Halfway down a person actually knowledgable about the system raises the legitimate concern that there are many non-consensual interventions, which is bad becaus

Halfway down a person actually knowledgable about the system raises the legitimate concern that there are many non-consensual interventions, which is bad because they work way worse than the consensual ones. A hypothesis could be that the predictions of an impressive sounding system means people are less concerned about getting consent. This hypothesis is completely absent from the text, and instead it is just the textual equivalent of a video with menacing music aling pictures of the text "Government" and clips of police brutality. Honestly I wonder if the author of the piece even accept that the government keeps a record of who has citizenship.