3 ms·
> They started the war, killed millions of people in the process (including many millions of civilians in Asia), and then had the gall to try to bargain for dec
by DocTomoe 7y ago
> They started the war, killed millions of people in the process (including many millions of civilians in Asia), and then had the gall to try to bargain for decent surrender terms after all that horror they caused?
Applying that standard, there would not be a single American left alive for the constant war they wage since the end of WW2.
- CydeWeys 7y agoThe key difference is that Japan was defeated utterly; the US was never even close. The last fighting we did on our home soil was the Civil War; discounting that, 1812. In warfare more than almost anything else, might matters.
- DocTomoe 7y agoIndeed. You better pray that the US keeps being able to keep war away from their soil, because what comes around goes around. Especially when people like you gleefully claim that civilians "had it coming".
- CydeWeys 7y agoThe thousands of nuclear weapons we have make this an academic question. Everyone knows that we would use them if facing an invasion of our homeland, so there never will be a foreign invasion on our soil. I know we've done some shitty things to a variety of different countries over the years, but those acts are never going to be reciprocated in kind because they're the kinds of acts that only the powerful can do to the weak, and the US is not weak. It's not a value or moral judgment, it's just the reality of how power and force work.
- DocTomoe 7y agoSpoken like a true Roman, ca. 409 AC