4 ms·
So there's an higher chance they could leave without notice for lack of funding or because their full time job leave them not enough time
by lostjohnny 7y ago
So there's an higher chance they could leave without notice for lack of funding or because their full time job leave them not enough time
- coldtea 7y agoYes, and hence a higher chance that they are not a hardened paid-for core team, but a looser team where people can come and go, and where an outsider can get influence.
- lostjohnny 7y agoThis always reminds me of this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw9gaEiQAxY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pw9gaEiQAxY people should be paid to work to a product under some direction, if you want some professional outcome teams where people come and go rarely have built solid products Take for example the Linux kernel, Alan Cox has been working on it non-stop from 1991 to 2009, and even after resigning as TTY maintainer, he was still heavily involved up to 2014 From 1999 to 2009 he was employed by RedHat and after That by Intel until 2013 I can't honestly say he did RedHat or Intel interests more than he did Linux community as a whole interests He's a big advocate and activist for free software, but he also said "Yearn for the good old days when you knew every contributor by name and the source code fitted on a single floppy disc ?" In a way or another, a small group of "directors" is always better for the good of both the product and the users