Sure, but it still makes sense that that number would still result in a flat zero - or be disregarded - since Stockfish is (presumably?) capable of evaluating a

Sure, but it still makes sense that that number would still result in a flat zero - or be disregarded - since Stockfish is (presumably?) capable of evaluating and realizing the absolute 0 chance, no? I'm not claiming to have special knowledge of these algorithms but it makes at least intuitive sense to me.