> But junk is perjorative word which suggests that it is entirely disposable even desirable to remove That's subjective. > It may turn out to be a sort of fil

> But junk is perjorative word which suggests that it is entirely disposable even desirable to remove That's subjective. > It may turn out to be a sort of filler Yes, that's understood and recognized in every analysis. > the name for it is very presumptive. Naming is hard. The lowest common denominator (least amount of thought/simplest concept) will almost always persist. It's not like someone is wringing their hands in the background imagining they have fooled the scientific community.