3 ms·
Left unexplained is this rather large mystery: "For the long period from the appearance of modern Homo sapiens up to the starting point of this chart in 10,000
by lkrubner 7y ago
Left unexplained is this rather large mystery:
"For the long period from the appearance of modern Homo sapiens up to the starting point of this chart in 10,000 BCE it is estimated that the total world population was often well under one million."
As others have often pointed out, as a large bodied mammal, we would expect humans to be roughly as successful as other widely dispersed large body mammals. And yet its thought that there were 100 million bison on the planet before human civilization arose. So there should have been 100 million humans on the planet. Why would there be so few humans, if other large body mammals were so plentiful? I'm inclined to think they are underestimating the number of humans on the planet in 10,000 BC, or there must be a good reason why there were so few humans.
- tropo 7y agoIt has to do with the trophic level. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trophic_level https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trophic_level Plants are almost always level 1. Bison would be just a bit over 2. (a bit over because they may consume bugs, bones, etc.) Humans would usually be higher than that. The traditional Eskimo diet is nearly trophic level 5. Due to loss of energy going from one level to the next, the biomass of creatures with high trophic level is limited: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_pyramid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecological_pyramid