4 ms·
You cannot be a employee of Google and "100% unrelated to this project". I understand you're not involved with it directly but you've obviously bought into the
by fhbdukfrh 7y ago
You cannot be a employee of Google and "100% unrelated to this project". I understand you're not involved with it directly but you've obviously bought into the company, their mission and their methods.
As far as tinfoil hats (thanks for the assumption that anyone skeptical of Google's intentions is a crackpot) if this was not a net gain for them and merely a feature for enterprise compliance, why are they turning it on fit all Google apps clients by default? Under your charitable scenario they could offer it to those who need it without impacting us crazies.
- B-Con 7y agoThat's close enough, in big company dynamics being in an unrelated arm can be farther away than some members of the public. Feels like a nit. I didn't imply every skeptic was donning tinfoil, but I saw a couple claims here and elsewhere in that range. The default setting is to allow e-mails to be sent confidentially, not to actually send them confidentially. Seems like a typical default. Here's a new feature, by default you're allowed to use it unless domain admins want to disable it.
- joshuamorton 7y agoI think you misunderstand what default means in this context. The admin console setting for "people in my org" is on by default. Individual emails aren't confidential by default. (I also work at Google, and technically on Gmail, although not on the product).