> I'm not sure reading the phrase "genital analyzer" makes me feel like you are giving an unbiased description of the events. I obviously am not a fan of TSA,

> I'm not sure reading the phrase "genital analyzer" makes me feel like you are giving an unbiased description of the events. I obviously am not a fan of TSA, but what is "unbiased" in this context? TSA tells us it's some sort of security analysis device, which is obviously biased because they've gone and bought thousands so I can't trust them to report accurately on it. It's also not as they say it is - independent security auditors have regularly defeated the device. Hence I posit that the device is a genital analysis device, as that is another purpose it serves.