I have read this article to the end, also read the WSJ article [1] (mentioned at the beginning) and wondered what value / knowledge does this TC take added to w

I have read this article to the end, also read the WSJ article [1] (mentioned at the beginning) and wondered what value / knowledge does this TC take added to what there is at the WSJ original article already. Seriously, next time, I suggest, just TC author should tweet about the WSJ's article and attach the "attractive" title to it and that is all to it. [1] http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704058704576015630188568972.html http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405274870405870457601...