3 ms·
I'm all for having the producer pay for the type of packaging he's using: plastic or polluting package should be taxed much more than, sya, cardboard. But I'm o
by rakoo 7y ago
I'm all for having the producer pay for the type of packaging he's using: plastic or polluting package should be taxed much more than, sya, cardboard. But I'm of the opinion that the one who's responsible is the one who is buying stuff in the first place. If there's no demand there's no production, and no pollution.
- HeWhoLurksLate 7y agoCardboard costs trees. Trees are a renewable resource, if you have enough space. Wait, don't producers already pay for the type of packaging they use?
- rakoo 7y agoEverything costs something, but I think we can both agree that cardboard is more environmental-friendly than plastic. I was talking about a specific tax on pollution, like a carbon tax: the more your choices as a producer impact the environment, the more you should pay.