This claim will be hard for anyone to assess without having read and understood Hegel, particularly the incredibly long and dense "Science of Logic." While I ha

This claim will be hard for anyone to assess without having read and understood Hegel, particularly the incredibly long and dense "Science of Logic." While I haven't read the latter, his interpretation on the surface seems like a gross simplification of something that few scholars agree on, regarding a book that few have read. If Hegel's ontology were as simple as the author described, it would be standard knowledge in how to interpret Hegel, something I would have learned in my college modern philosophy class.