2 ms·
It is possible that it is Facebook that won’t allow subordinates to step in, in place of Zuck and Sandberg. I’m not saying that is what is happening. But it cou
by hodder 7y ago
It is possible that it is Facebook that won’t allow subordinates to step in, in place of Zuck and Sandberg. I’m not saying that is what is happening. But it could be. Facebook may see the risk to be too high for anyone but Zuck and Sandberg to attend these theatres given the billion+ fines that could come from them.
- Godel_unicode 7y agoGiven that the article is about how Facebook has decided not to send them, your hypothesis seems unlikely; they would be saying in effect that they prefer contempt charges to letting their local director talk. Or, to put another spin on it, that having their director talk is worse than doing nothing.
- Thorrez 7y ago>It is possible that it is Facebook that won’t allow subordinates to step in The article says that Facebook is sending subordinates: >Facebook said is it [sic] sending Kevin Chan, its head of public policy for Facebook Canada, and Neil Potts, its director of public policy, to the meeting instead.