3 ms·
Also see this: http://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/CheckEuclid/index.php http://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/CheckEuclid/index.php It seems a dependently t
by ratmice 7y ago
Also see this:
http://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/CheckEuclid/index.php http://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/CheckEuclid/index.php
It seems a dependently typed language might be overkill,
"The proofs described in this paper only need a rather weak logic. There are no function symbols", "only existential quantifiers; universal quantification over the free variables is left implicit."
They wrote a translator then to convert the proofs to HOL, and Coq, you could presumably do the same for e.g. idris
- meuk 7y agoAwesome, this was exactly the type of comment I was hoping for!