> it’s not a new problem or a problem that we lack prior art for. The prior art I'm aware of comes from the copyright, trademark, and defamation laws, but the

> it’s not a new problem or a problem that we lack prior art for. The prior art I'm aware of comes from the copyright, trademark, and defamation laws, but the definitions developed there are so vague that it can take a few months in court (and thousands of dollars) to decide whether something is a parody / satire. Here we need a rule that can applied within hours, at a very low cost. So I'm not sure how we can adapt existing legal definitions to banning videos on the internet. Could you describe in a bit more detail what exactly you propose?