2 ms·
Of course, it's not only about the songs. That would be a gross simplification. However, it's also a gross simplification to say it's just about which countri
by michael_dorfman 18y ago
Of course, it's not only about the songs. That would be a gross simplification.
However, it's also a gross simplification to say it's just about which countries like other countries.
For example: I'm writing this from Norway, which finished (they tell me) the best of all Western European countries. Now, Terry Wogan would argue that this is because of "Scandinavian Bloc" voting, but the fact of the matter is that you could remove the points given to Norway by Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Iceland, and give them to England, and Norway would still be far ahead of England in terms of points.
In fact, England is a great example of how Wogan's theory breaks down-- of 43 countries voting, only 2 chose England's song to be in the top 10 of 25 options. Every single country involved liked some one or more Eastern European song better than England's, independent of geographical location or political alliance.
So, let's not pretend it's all political-- some of it actually appears to relate to the music.
- axod 18y agoWhat? That's just it... It is political - No one in Europe likes the UK. That's why we loose every time. If we had a time machine, and took the winning Russian entry, and entered it as the UK song, I completely believe we would still have come last. Personally, I'd say some of the blame lies with our pro-bush politics and stance on Iraq. Eurovision has just ended up as a farce. The west put in all the money, and the east all vote for each other, and win.
- michael_dorfman 18y agoHuh? Norway has had a long love-affair with the UK-- many older Norwegians served in the UK armed forces in the war. Honestly: my nine-year-old daughter voted for Latvia (the Pirates), and described the UK entry as "the worst", even though her grandparents live in the UK, and she has absolutely no relationship to Latvia whatsoever.