> you ignored reprocessing dude, can you read 4 sentences or your limit is around two/three? because in the fourth I did consider reprocessing. > sea water w

> you ignored reprocessing dude, can you read 4 sentences or your limit is around two/three? because in the fourth I did consider reprocessing. > sea water which only exist in lab test scale and done massively would demolish ecosystems whole, because it's done by dropping huge capture sheets for months long all of these are about as far from implementation as fusion, and you won't see holding me breath for that. in the meanwhile, we'd be out of uranium and then what are we going to use to bridge the gap? that's why the 'just build 70x more nuclear plant' is untenable as a whole but you just cherry picked what was convenient and didn't even brought anything interesting to the discussion, just lab stage prototypes and nothing to get us from here to there, which is the critical part of this thing whole. same reasoning as the first guy I responded to: > build 70x more plants > eat up all convenient uranium > ???? > profit! well guess what, that ??? is what I was addressing. the technology is not yet there. how far is it? we don't even know that yet, that's the amount of information from your links. and in the between?