3 ms·
they already state those in the paper: "Our trial had some limitations, including the absence of a control group (each individual being their own control in our
by msapaydin 7y ago
they already state those in the paper: "Our trial had some limitations, including the absence of a control group (each individual being their own control in our study), the limited number of subjects, their young age (leading to extrapolation to the aging population), and the decision to focus on hydrogen-producing individuals as an inclusion criterion. However, we can clearly conclude that, by increasing the consumption of selected vegetables, it is possible to boost the intake of fructans and thereby create a shift in the gut microbiota composition. "
- glaugh 7y agoI think spenrose is saying “We shouldn’t be upvoting this” or maybe “I hope newspapers don’t report on this like it’s a clear, solid answer”, not “This paper is flawed in ways that the authors didn’t recognize”. Personally I’m fine with this being on HN because I think this audience understands issues around low N (and commentators do a good job of pointing them out), but I agree that it would be problematic if this were picked up by the New York Times or something.
- spenrose 7y agoThat is what I'm saying. "this audience understands ...": 1. I think a quick scan of their responses will refute that, but in any case 2. my point is that there is no value to this study for non-researchers. General sophistication doesn't matter.