3 ms·
Well, this nicely shows problems with this debate in a nutshell. 1) nuclear is covered in FUD: > I don't think we even have enough qualified personnel to buil
by _Tev 7y ago
Well, this nicely shows problems with this debate in a nutshell.
1) nuclear is covered in FUD:
> I don't think we even have enough qualified personnel to build the huge number of reactors
2) renewables "just work" without any issues ... Well at least everyone claims so:
> I think right now renewable energy with storage and improved grids provides a better carbon reduction per dollar than nuclear.
Can you provide a SINGLE example of any country on Earth with ability to store enough electricity to run the country for just ONE hour?
One minute?
And what would / did that cost? Can we actually scale it (pumped storage works nicely in ideal cases, but those are rare)?
The amount of handwaving around renewables is incredible ...