5 ms·
Indeed, it's not on the near horizon. I found this article illuminating: The Case Against Quantum Computing - https://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/the
by plainOldText 7y ago
Indeed, it's not on the near horizon. I found this article illuminating:
The Case Against Quantum Computing - https://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/the-case-against-quantum-computing https://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/the-case-agains...
- HanP77 7y agoThe article is indeed interesting. I find this one addressing it https://www.hpcwire.com/2019/01/09/the-case-against-the-case-against-quantum-computing/ https://www.hpcwire.com/2019/01/09/the-case-against-the-case...
- reikonomusha 7y agoDyakonov‘s opinions have been rebutted by many prominent quantum information scientists and physicists. To put it charitably, his arguments don’t agree with the consensus. Check out [1] as an example criticism of his writing. [1] https://scirate.com/arxiv/1903.10760 https://scirate.com/arxiv/1903.10760
- murat124 7y ago> I argue that they can’t. In the physical world, continuous quantities (be they voltages or the parameters defining quantum-mechanical wave functions) can be neither measured nor manipulated exactly. That is, no continuously variable quantity can be made to have an exact value, including zero. To a mathematician, this might sound absurd, but this is the unquestionable reality of the world we live in, as any engineer knows. Wasn't this problem addressed just recently? https://www.unibas.ch/en/News-Events/News/Uni-Research/The-geometry-of-an-electron-determined-for-the-first-time.html https://www.unibas.ch/en/News-Events/News/Uni-Research/The-g...