4 ms·
A stronger case would be "it must be more profitable than the alternatives with the same risk" but you skipped a step and went right to "appreciate faster" whic
by sisu2019 7y ago
A stronger case would be "it must be more profitable than the alternatives with the same risk" but you skipped a step and went right to "appreciate faster" which is not the only way it could be profitable. In fact "flipping houses" to make a living at this scale is an artifact of your current time and place which is the US in a massive inflationary bubble [1]
We libertarians have been beating the inflation drum for decades now and been largely ignored and / or laughed at. Maybe it's time to revisit how adding trillions and trillions to the economy every year could maybe possibly lead to higher prices in "inflation hedge" type goods.[2]
[1] https://thumbor.forbes.com/thumbor/960x0/https%3A%2F%2Fblogs-images.forbes.com%2Fjessecolombo%2Ffiles%2F2018%2F08%2FNetworthGDPIndex.jpg https://thumbor.forbes.com/thumbor/960x0/https%3A%2F%2Fblogs...
[2] https://mises.org/library/housing-too-good-be-true https://mises.org/library/housing-too-good-be-true