> The incentives are aligned properly here. You sure about that? To me it seems like YouTube's incentives are to minimize the chances of advertiser irritation,

> The incentives are aligned properly here. You sure about that? To me it seems like YouTube's incentives are to minimize the chances of advertiser irritation, while the incentives of the children would be to maximize their engagement while minimizing (the impact of) predation. Getting rid of children's channels entirely would be an acceptable outcome for YouTube, but I doubt the children in question would agree.