2 ms·
Of course you mean numbers of the form 2^(2^n) + 1; without the increment, primality is easy to check. :-) Anyway, are you sure that it would be so easy to ch
by JadeNB 7y ago
Of course you mean numbers of the form 2^(2^n) + 1; without the increment, primality is easy to check. :-) Anyway, are you sure that it would be so easy to check primality of 15-decimal-digit numbers without even a pocket calculator, especially with no guarantee that there was any reason to do so? (Notice, for example, that you needed to add "if someone told me to".)
For more on this, see KConrad's comment https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/16636/is-there-a-simple-example-that-empirical-evidence-is-misleading/16640#comment41945_16640 https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/16636/is-t... and kcrisman's comment https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/16636/is-there-a-simple-example-that-empirical-evidence-is-misleading/16640#comment41973_16640 https://matheducators.stackexchange.com/questions/16636/is-t... on the post linked by your parent.
- saagarjha 7y agoYes, thanks for the correction :) I've fixed it above.