3 ms·
I have come to expect bad articles about housing but I have to say this one was fairly on point and succinct. The trend towards urbanization is obviously a fac
by cletus 7y ago
I have come to expect bad articles about housing but I have to say this one was fairly on point and succinct.
The trend towards urbanization is obviously a factor so it's not just a question of building houses, it's a matter of building up enough to soak up demand and then some.
I see three big problems:
1. Many cities incentivize building the wrong kind of housing. Look at Manhattan where most new housing below 125th street is not the least bit affordable, some exceeding $5000/sq ft.
2. Capital is essentially global. Real estate in urban centers has become the de facto way to park money. This is a problem.
3. Tax structures encourage this. I like the Swiss system that punitively taxes short term capital gains and property (and makes owning property in Switzerland reasonably restrictive). You need people to own housing units they don't live in. Who do you think you're renting that apartment from? But residential real estate has moved away from being an income-generating asset to being a speculative asset. Low capital gains tax rates encourage this. Also, for some reason, real estate assets tend to be exempt from AML type reporting like FATCA, FBAR, etc. No idea why. But this needs to end.
I think you could go a long way to fixing this by saying that if you own property in a given city you are a resident of that city, state and country and your worldwide income is taxable. This needs to be coupled with stopping the hiding of ownership through corporate shells.
- opportune 7y ago>Who do you think you're renting that apartment from? If enough of the housing market were publicly owned (see Vienna) or decommodified (meaning, it is illegal to own more than one housing unit/to rent property out. If you own a residential property you must live in it) the laws of supply and demand dictate that the price of the property would be lowered until the point that the people who would like to rent there, in aggregate, would be able to afford to purchase instead. Of course this will probably never happen because too many people would have the rug swept out from under them in terms of net worth, but it is possible.
- gshdg 7y agoA city where no one can rent will die because young people can’t move in.