4 ms·
It does matter, because it makes sense to focus on the biggest contributors to emissions, where the most gains could be made. The current thinking goes we shou
by ar-jan 7y ago
It does matter, because it makes sense to focus on the biggest contributors to emissions, where the most gains could be made.
The current thinking goes we should eat "less or no meat", when the effort could be put towards not using grain for livestock feed, and promoting other changes such as reducing methane specifically by adding seaweed to the livestock's diet. That's not to mention that grazing is essential to both prevent and reverse desertification.
- rewq4321 7y agoI think this is a "we shouldn't bother with X because Y also helps (and is more convenient for me), even though they're not mutually exclusive" argument.