3 ms·
I'd say the consequences were intended. > companies deleting articles even when there would sufficient public interest Is that really part of GDPR? That just
by soulofmischief 7y ago
I'd say the consequences were intended.
> companies deleting articles even when there would sufficient public interest
Is that really part of GDPR? That just seems authoritative.
- Quanttek 7y agoNot really. The GDPR stipulates a right to be forgotten [1] with the following exceptions: > 3. Paragraphs 1 and 2 shall not apply to the extent that processing is necessary: > (a) for exercising the right of freedom of expression and information; > (b) for compliance with a legal obligation which requires processing by Union or Member State law to which the controller is subject or for the performance of a task carried out in the public interest or in the exercise of official authority vested in the controller; > (c) for reasons of public interest in the area of public health in accordance with points (h) and (i) of Article 9(2) as well as Article 9(3); > (d) for archiving purposes in the public interest, scientific or historical research purposes or statistical purposes in accordance with Article 89(1) in so far as the right referred to in paragraph 1 is likely to render impossible or seriously impair the achievement of the objectives of that processing; or > (e) for the establishment, exercise or defence of legal claims. [1] https://gdpr-info.eu/art-17-gdpr/ https://gdpr-info.eu/art-17-gdpr/