> Wrong, false, liable, limited set of privacy related information should be correctable, removable Which is exactly what the law is for. The examples in the

> Wrong, false, liable, limited set of privacy related information should be correctable, removable Which is exactly what the law is for. The examples in the article were deceptively reported. For example, the doctor who asked The Guardian to take down articles about her suspension: she had successfully appealed that case, and a judge overturned her suspension and ordered the record expunged: her name was dragged through the mud on bad information. Compare that to the US where any kind of accusation, even if it turns out to be false, can easily permanently ruin someone's job, career prospects, or life.