3 ms·
A) Deterrents don't work very well, rarely work at all with desperate people, and far less with people who have mental issues. B) if you end up in a conflict i
by jopsen 7y ago
A) Deterrents don't work very well, rarely work at all with desperate people, and far less with people who have mental issues.
B) if you end up in a conflict it's always better to run. It's safer for you than to escalate. In sane countries failing to run can invalidate any claim of self-defense. Thus, you'd find yourself on the hook for "armed assult".
Even if you state or country is crazy enough to have a "stand your ground" law, you are always better served by running away or de-escalating by other means.
Your ego might be hurt, but that is rarely fatal :)
- CompanionCuuube 7y agoReduced mobility means running away doesn't work very well. :) In sane countries, a victim isn't revictimized by the courts for having the audacity to defend themselves either. :)