3 ms·
https://twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1132345806177144833 https://twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1132345806177144833 Some interesting rebuttal notes. Apparently i
by NikolaeVarius 7y ago
https://twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1132345806177144833 https://twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1132345806177144833
Some interesting rebuttal notes. Apparently it is the vulnerability that is being exploited, not eternalblue itself.
- dtornabene 7y agointeresting! thanks for linking that
- thinkling 7y agoI find one of the responses pretty compelling: > This is a distinction without meaning. Infosec frequently uses the same name to refer to a vulnerability and a corresponding exploit. I don't agree with the framing of the story either, but calling it "fake news" is a serious accusation that goes too far. https://twitter.com/mehaase/status/1132366433491533824 https://twitter.com/mehaase/status/1132366433491533824
- NikolaeVarius 7y agoI'm less interested in the accusations and more about the content.
- mediocrejoker 7y agoDigging into this a bit more and reading between the lines of the nytimes article, it sounds to me like EternalBlue was indeed used as part of the attack chain, for lateral movement. It was not the only exploit used, nor would the attack have been wholly prevented without it. https://twitter.com/nicoleperlroth/status/1132326021242400769 https://twitter.com/nicoleperlroth/status/113232602124240076...