3 ms·
ah damn, my bad, hehe well, I know a lot of people that do fast reading and having it in bold makes this easier, but yeah, maybe this time I over exceeded mysel
by abarrera 16y ago
ah damn, my bad, hehe well, I know a lot of people that do fast reading and having it in bold makes this easier, but yeah, maybe this time I over exceeded myself :P
- eru 16y agoYou have to commit to one audience, I guess.
- vietor 16y agoCould you clarify what you mean by "fast reading"? I read very quickly and it was like speedbumps for my eyes. If the article hadn't been short enough to fit on one screen I think I would have been annoyed enough to not finish it.
- abarrera 16y agohttp://www.copyblogger.com/the-10-second-rule/ http://www.copyblogger.com/the-10-second-rule/ Not that I used that, but I'm a diagonal reader myself and I do appreciate the bold parts. But as I said before, there are 2 things that don't work too well, which is, the current blog theme isn't great and too much bold parts on my side.
- vietor 16y agoInteresting, thank you. It got me thinking about and paying attention to how I read things, and that I will read them very differently depending on the source. Articles linked from HN fall into the 'fast but linear' category. Maybe if I'd ran across your article form a source I give less weight to the bold wouldn't have bothered me ...
- abarrera 16y ago:) Well, It does seem to have too much bold, so next time I'll make it just a few parts to avoid breaking people's flow :)