4 ms·
I've met many people that romanticise the role of executives as those burdening an incredible responsibility and therefore are compensated as such. But this is
by Jonnax 7y ago
I've met many people that romanticise the role of executives as those burdening an incredible responsibility and therefore are compensated as such.
But this is one of the first times where I see there's some potential consequence to negative or destruction actions conducted.
- marvin 7y agoWell, they made a lot of money by reducing the personnel costs in spite of the law making it very difficult to do so. So they definitely earned their salaries. The system works for optimizing profit under the contraints that exists. Notably, there are no moral constraints defined, and the morality of these actions are not a subject in this trial. I think this is a sad state of affairs. It could work if the law perfectly reflected the ethics.
- perl4ever 7y agoI don't understand why you (your comment is representative of many others I've seen) don't understand why executives get paid a lot. People get paid a lot because other people think they can trust them. Once it turns out you were wrong about trusting someone, you don't say "well, I will stop paying people I think I can trust so much!"